Beyond the Standard model
The New Standard Model for Elementary Particles: 1024- Qam
"Lighthouse model"
| newstandardmodel-may2024.pdf |
/
/
The Proposed New Standard Model for Elementary Particles.
Just line up the particles in order, by mass. They appear in groups of 4. The gray boxes are known particles.
Note the pattern in each column: Quark-Lepton-Quark-Lepton. This cannot be mere coincidence.
/
The Proposed New Standard Model for Elementary Particles.
Just line up the particles in order, by mass. They appear in groups of 4. The gray boxes are known particles.
Note the pattern in each column: Quark-Lepton-Quark-Lepton. This cannot be mere coincidence.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Rev 10.1 - Missing particles have been named. Mass estimates in red.
/
/.
There are 1024 elementary particles = 64 particle masses X 16 probabilities each (4 charges X 4 spins)
/
This new model includes Supersymmetry
Note that a new undiscovered type of particle is the Quatern. It's function is similar to a Boson, but it is a new type of particle. There must be 4 particle types, not 3.
/
/
Revision to the QAM model.
Notes:
1. QAM pattern is due to a blinking universe at 1.1 THz.
2. Red mass values are engineering estimates +/- 20%.
3. Evidence is already available in existing data at SLAC, Fermi & CERN.
4. Some particle lifetimes are much less than 1 trillionth of second.
5. Nyquist-Shannon theory requires sample rate of 2.2 Thz or faster
6. Cameras at CERN: 40 million frames/second is too slow.
7. Mathematical pattern of particle masses may be similar to hyperbolic function.
8. High pass/low pass filter creates a "mass trap" for detection.
9. Supersymmetry is present, but not shown on this table.
10. DARPA has been stealing my intellectual property for many years. RICO organization.
/
/.
There are 1024 elementary particles = 64 particle masses X 16 probabilities each (4 charges X 4 spins)
/
This new model includes Supersymmetry
Note that a new undiscovered type of particle is the Quatern. It's function is similar to a Boson, but it is a new type of particle. There must be 4 particle types, not 3.
/
/
Revision to the QAM model.
Notes:
1. QAM pattern is due to a blinking universe at 1.1 THz.
2. Red mass values are engineering estimates +/- 20%.
3. Evidence is already available in existing data at SLAC, Fermi & CERN.
4. Some particle lifetimes are much less than 1 trillionth of second.
5. Nyquist-Shannon theory requires sample rate of 2.2 Thz or faster
6. Cameras at CERN: 40 million frames/second is too slow.
7. Mathematical pattern of particle masses may be similar to hyperbolic function.
8. High pass/low pass filter creates a "mass trap" for detection.
9. Supersymmetry is present, but not shown on this table.
10. DARPA has been stealing my intellectual property for many years. RICO organization.
Rev 10.3
/
/
/
/
Rev 10.4 will be controversial. I have shown and explained why the "tens" groups are absent from our 4-D universe.
/
/
/
/
Rev 10.4 will be controversial. I have shown and explained why the "tens" groups are absent from our 4-D universe.
"They are, if you prefer, incipient particles that have not yet emerged into matter."
-- Seth Speaks, Session 524, 1970.
" ... dream reality is as valid and real as waking reality."
-- Seth Material, Chapter 14.
/
/
Comments and Notes on the 1024-QAM Periodic Table
10 April 2024, Rev 2
1) It looks like the Clara and Stanford particles might be neutrinos. Does this mean that all fourth particles (IV) are neutrinos, or just 4 of them? It seems likely then that the Top Boson is also a heavy neutrino.
I am leaning towards - only 4. This template would then apply to the supersymmetry side.
2) The Top Quark is obviously a Boson. They will figure it out.
3) Supersymmetry particles in the 9th thru 16th mass groups probably have very short lives. This may readily explain one of the difficulties in identifying them. A faster "camera system" at CERN or FERMI should reveal something.
4) Theodore Lach's equation, at first seemed very promising, but I now believe it is not correct. We can estimate the mass values of unidentified particles, and using an invention called a "Mass Trap" - we may be able to isolate them. A Mass Trap would be a device that only allows a mass of a narrow range of values to pass thru - sort of like a low pass and high pass filter together creating a narrow range.
Note the hyperbolic/parabolic math pattern in relation to the particle masses - from the right hand side, ie.,
172.69 - 198 - 511 - 1319
91.2 - 105.7 - 170 - 273
5) If it can be isolated, the Grand particle is possibly so large that it can be seen with the naked eye, under certain conditions. It is possibly as large as a single cell. Is it possibly as large as the entire calculated universe? = 0.272 mm (0.01")
6) In schematic theory, the 3 universes of Matter, Antimatter, and Dream, can be fitted together like a "Y" shape, where the Dream universe is in the middle and "feeding" particles into the universes of matter and antimatter. The question remains - how do parallel universes "fit" together with these schematics? Does the Dream universe also feed the parallel universes? This seems necessary for the universes to be related.
7) Is there any method to prove the existence of Massless particles in the Dream universe? It seems like a very challenging problem... Perhaps monitoring the influx of particles at the E point - might show evidence of the particles acquiring mass.
8) Seth said that by closely watching the neutral line (C and E points) we should be able to glimpse into the universe of antimatter. A very interesting prospect...
9) The Mass Groups of the Dream Universe cannot really be called that. Perhaps "Energy Groups" is a better term.
10) It seems odd that there are only 512 particles in the Dream Universe. A more elegant solution would seem to be, the same number of particles. There must be a valid reason for this? Do mass particles need to appear in pairs?
11) Our entire universal design seems to be structured around counting in "tens" and orders of magnitude. Why would every intelligent race necessarily count in "tens"? They might learn to count in Base 2 or Base 8...
12) The next easiest particles to identify should be Tetra, Nu, and Upsilon. These were the first 3 that I predicted. The mass range suggests they are easy to find. They might already be hidden in the data of previous experiments at CERN and FERMI.
13) In 1991, the Oh-My-God particle's energy was estimated as (3.2±0.9)×10^20 eV. This amount of ~100 FeV, lines up nicely with the 1024-QAM Model. It may have been an sStrange particle, the heavyweight counterpart of the Strange particle.
14) At least seven similar events (energy 5.7×10^19 eV or greater) have been recorded.
15) Quanta Magazine notes that, "And HAWC does not probe perhaps the most puzzling aspect of the earlier data: a mysterious narrow dip in the gamma-ray signal at frequencies of 1 trillion trillion hertz. (10^24)" This value coincides with the last mass group (mass group 16) in the 1024-QAM table at 100 ZeV. Beyond this mass group, there are no more elementary particles - and this explains the dip. This provides further evidence that the 1024-QAM Model is correct.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/strange-solar-gamma-rays-discovered-at-even-higher-energies-20230227/
This also suggests that some of the vibrations found in frequencies of 10^12 thru 10^23 are likely from elementary particles as predicted by the 1024-QAM model. For example, if there are 4 peaks in the range of 100 ZeV thru 990 ZeV, then this may be evidence of the 4 particles - Wino, Zino, Higgsino, & Grand.
I propose that the specific mass values for supersymmetry can be found in cosmic-ray data. Look for patterns of four.
-- Seth Speaks, Session 524, 1970.
" ... dream reality is as valid and real as waking reality."
-- Seth Material, Chapter 14.
/
/
Comments and Notes on the 1024-QAM Periodic Table
10 April 2024, Rev 2
1) It looks like the Clara and Stanford particles might be neutrinos. Does this mean that all fourth particles (IV) are neutrinos, or just 4 of them? It seems likely then that the Top Boson is also a heavy neutrino.
I am leaning towards - only 4. This template would then apply to the supersymmetry side.
2) The Top Quark is obviously a Boson. They will figure it out.
3) Supersymmetry particles in the 9th thru 16th mass groups probably have very short lives. This may readily explain one of the difficulties in identifying them. A faster "camera system" at CERN or FERMI should reveal something.
4) Theodore Lach's equation, at first seemed very promising, but I now believe it is not correct. We can estimate the mass values of unidentified particles, and using an invention called a "Mass Trap" - we may be able to isolate them. A Mass Trap would be a device that only allows a mass of a narrow range of values to pass thru - sort of like a low pass and high pass filter together creating a narrow range.
Note the hyperbolic/parabolic math pattern in relation to the particle masses - from the right hand side, ie.,
172.69 - 198 - 511 - 1319
91.2 - 105.7 - 170 - 273
5) If it can be isolated, the Grand particle is possibly so large that it can be seen with the naked eye, under certain conditions. It is possibly as large as a single cell. Is it possibly as large as the entire calculated universe? = 0.272 mm (0.01")
6) In schematic theory, the 3 universes of Matter, Antimatter, and Dream, can be fitted together like a "Y" shape, where the Dream universe is in the middle and "feeding" particles into the universes of matter and antimatter. The question remains - how do parallel universes "fit" together with these schematics? Does the Dream universe also feed the parallel universes? This seems necessary for the universes to be related.
7) Is there any method to prove the existence of Massless particles in the Dream universe? It seems like a very challenging problem... Perhaps monitoring the influx of particles at the E point - might show evidence of the particles acquiring mass.
8) Seth said that by closely watching the neutral line (C and E points) we should be able to glimpse into the universe of antimatter. A very interesting prospect...
9) The Mass Groups of the Dream Universe cannot really be called that. Perhaps "Energy Groups" is a better term.
10) It seems odd that there are only 512 particles in the Dream Universe. A more elegant solution would seem to be, the same number of particles. There must be a valid reason for this? Do mass particles need to appear in pairs?
11) Our entire universal design seems to be structured around counting in "tens" and orders of magnitude. Why would every intelligent race necessarily count in "tens"? They might learn to count in Base 2 or Base 8...
12) The next easiest particles to identify should be Tetra, Nu, and Upsilon. These were the first 3 that I predicted. The mass range suggests they are easy to find. They might already be hidden in the data of previous experiments at CERN and FERMI.
13) In 1991, the Oh-My-God particle's energy was estimated as (3.2±0.9)×10^20 eV. This amount of ~100 FeV, lines up nicely with the 1024-QAM Model. It may have been an sStrange particle, the heavyweight counterpart of the Strange particle.
14) At least seven similar events (energy 5.7×10^19 eV or greater) have been recorded.
15) Quanta Magazine notes that, "And HAWC does not probe perhaps the most puzzling aspect of the earlier data: a mysterious narrow dip in the gamma-ray signal at frequencies of 1 trillion trillion hertz. (10^24)" This value coincides with the last mass group (mass group 16) in the 1024-QAM table at 100 ZeV. Beyond this mass group, there are no more elementary particles - and this explains the dip. This provides further evidence that the 1024-QAM Model is correct.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/strange-solar-gamma-rays-discovered-at-even-higher-energies-20230227/
This also suggests that some of the vibrations found in frequencies of 10^12 thru 10^23 are likely from elementary particles as predicted by the 1024-QAM model. For example, if there are 4 peaks in the range of 100 ZeV thru 990 ZeV, then this may be evidence of the 4 particles - Wino, Zino, Higgsino, & Grand.
I propose that the specific mass values for supersymmetry can be found in cosmic-ray data. Look for patterns of four.
Seth on "particles"
findingseth.com
“Any investigation of the basic inner universe, which is the only real universe, must be done as much as possible from a point outside your own distortions … To get outside your own universe, you must travel inward … Your so-called scientific, so-called objective experiments can continue for an eternity, but they will only probe further and further with camouflage [physical] instruments into a camouflage universe … The subconscious, it is true, has elements of its own distortions, but these are easier to escape than the tons of distortive camouflage atmosphere that weigh your scientific experiments down.”
Session 45. The Early Sessions.
No particular physical particle exists for any amount of time.
No particular physical particle has any kind of durability.
TES2 Session 60 June 8, 1964
The framework is so woven that each particle is dependent upon every other. [...]
[...] It is the developer of all abilities and at the risk of being trite, it is the responsibility of even the most minute particle of consciousness to use its own abilities, and all of its abilities to the utmost.
TES1 Session 29 February 26, 1964
I have said that, first of all, molecules and atoms and even smaller particles, have a condensed consciousness.
[...] The molecules and atoms and even smaller particles, all contain their separate consciousness. [...]
This goes on ad infinitum, and yet even the lowest particle retains its own individuality, and is not stripped of any ability.
TES2 Session 50 May 4, 1964
If we may speak in an analogy, then these particles have two faces. If you consider them as soldiers guarding the barriers or the boundaries, then you would have to imagine a strange creature, our particle, as a soldier on a boundary facing toward and away from the country in question.
[...] The inner alignment and electromagnetic structure of such particles is the main issue that allows them to be, or to operate within, two different units or systems. And while these particles act as resistant boundary forces, they are also uniting forces, forming so to speak the connective tissue that both separates and unites.
These identifying particles, as we will call them, that both close about a system yet still unite it to other systems, these particles are also inherent properties of any unit or system.
TES3 Session 114 December 14, 1964
These coordinate points — absolute, main, or subordinate — represent accumulations or traces of pure energy, minute to an extreme if you are thinking in terms of size — smaller than any particle of which your scientists know for example, but composed of pure energy. [...]
[...] They are, if you prefer, incipient particles that have not yet emerged into matter.
SS Part One: Chapter 5: Session 524, April 20, 1970
There are indeed universes composed of such faster-than-light particles. [...] You simply would not perceive such particles as mass. When these particles are slowed down sufficiently, you do experience them as matter.
SS Part Two: Chapter 20: Session 581, April 14, 1971
While this may sound quite sacrilegious scientifically, it is possible to understand the electron’s nature and greater reality by using certain focuses of consciousness: by probing the electron, for example, with a “laser” [beam] of consciousness finely focused and attuned — and more will be said about this later in the book.
UR1 Section 3: Session 703 June 12, 1974
So can the human self appear in several places at once, each such appearance subtly altering the “human” particle, so that each appearance is a version of an “original” self that as itself never appears in those terms.6 When you look at an electron — figuratively speaking — you are observing a trace or a track of something else entirely, and that appearance is termed an electron. [...] In a way, then, you are as ghostly as an electron.
UR2 Section 5: Session 722 November 27, 1974
“Subatomic particles,” however, appear in your present, rippling into your system’s dimensions, creating their own “tracks,” which scientists then try to observe. In some cases, unknowingly, your scientists are close to observing the birth of time effects within your system."
UR2 Section 5: Session 722 November 27, 1974
This section also includes discussions on the True Dream-Art Scientist, the True Mental Physicist, and the Complete Physician, as well as material on subatomic particles and the spin of electrons in relationship to perceived reality.
UR2 Introductory Notes by Robert F. Butts, 1974
The behavior of electrons, for example, will elude your technological knowledge — for in deepest terms what you will “perceive” will be a facade, an appearance or illusion. So far, within the rules of the game, you have been able to make your “facts” about electrons work. To follow their multidimensional activity however is another matter — (humorously:) a pun — and you need, if you will forgive me, a speedier means.
UR1 Section 3: Session 702 June 10, 1974
Electrons, for example, are slow dullards in comparison with EE units. It goes without saying that the units of consciousness are “mental,” or if you prefer, disembodied, though from their inner organization all physical forms emerge. [...] [...] Now the same applies to these units of consciousness — and to atoms, molecules, electrons, and other such phenomena.
UR1 Section 1: Session 684 February 20, 1974
If physical form is made up of such multitudinous, invisible particles, how much more highly organized must be the inner components of consciousness, without whose perceptions matter itself would be meaningless. The alliances of consciousness, then, are far more vast than those of particles in any form.
TPS4 Deleted Session July 3, 1978
Every visible or invisible particle has consciousness according to its own scale of reality. Each particle, visible or invisible, is awareized energy. This is most difficult to explain, but like, say, the units of some multidimensional computer, each visible or invisible particle carries within it the knowledge of all other particles, including their positions, and their probable positions.
[...] There is then an almost instantaneous flow of information throughout such particles. [...]
That same information is available on a cellular basis (pause), and to the smaller particles that make up the bodies of the experimenters, and the structure of the instruments.
TPS5 Deleted Session April 30, 1979
Each unit of consciousness inherently possesses within itself all of the information available to the whole, and its specific nature when it operates as a particle rests upon that great “body” of inner knowledge. Any one such particle can be where it “is,” be what it is, and be when it is only because the positions, relative positions, and situations of all other such particles are known.
These EE units also operate as fields, as waves, or as particles, as the units of consciousness do—but in your terms they are closer to physical orientation. [...] There are literally numberless steps taken before EE units combine in their own fashion to form the most microscopic physical particles, and even here the greatest, gentlest sorting-out process takes place as these units disentangle themselves at certain operational levels (underlined) from their own greater fields of “information,” to specialize in the various elements that will allow for the production of atoms and molecules impeccably suited to your kind of world.
[...] All of these units of consciousness, again, operate as entities (or particles, or as waves or forces).
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 890, December 19, 1979
It is fashionable to say that some scientific laws can be proven at microscopic levels, where, for example, small particles can be accelerated far beyond [their usual states]. But you quite studiously ignore that feeling exists on microscopic levels, that there can be psychological particles, much less come to the conclusion that all particles are psychological particles, with their own impetuses for development and value fulfillment. [...]
(9:23.) If the simplest particle is so endowed with impetus, with hidden ideals that seek fulfillment, then what about the human being?
NoME Part Three: Chapter 9: Session 866, July 18, 1979
All That Is composes the fabric of the universe—which is everywhere unified, since nothing exists outside of it, and every wave or particle, or field or whatever within it, consists of a divine psychological fabric that is populated by individuation, sensation, meaning, intent, in which the most innocuous shadow of an electron rises up joyfully and shouts “I am I, and not you.”
TPS5 Deleted Session September 20, 1978
Consciousness is within the tiniest particle, whatever its life conditions seem to be, or however it might seem to lack those conditions you call living.
[.I know that each smallest “particle” of consciousness can never be broken down, and that each contains an infinite capacity for creativity and development — and that each is innately blessed.
NotP Chapter 11: Session 796, March 7, 1977
Electrons in your terms are precognitive, and so is your cellular consciousness. Your body’s relative permanence in time is dependent upon the electron’s magnificent behavior as it deals with probabilities.
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 888, December 10, 1979
"...some particles live for far less than a trillionth of a second."
DEaVF1 Chapter 2: Session 884, October 3, 1979
The varieties of consciousness—the inner “psychological particles,” the psychic equivalent, say, of the atom or molecule, or proton, neutron or quark—these nonphysical, charmed, strange forms of consciousness that make experience go up or down (all with amusement), and around and around, are never of course dealt with.
The atom, the molecule, the proton and neutron, the electrons, the quarks and other families of particles represent aspects of consciousness itself, which man then projects into the world of physics.
TPS4 Deleted Session July 3, 1978
Beyond certain levels it is almost meaningless to speak in terms of particles, but I will for now use the term “invisible particles” because you are familiar with it. Invisible particles, then, form the foundation of your world. The invisible particles that I am referring to, however, have the ability to transform themselves into mass,1 or to divest themselves of it. And the invisible particles of which I speak not only possess consciousness—but each one is, if you will, a seed that contains within itself a potential for an infinite number of gestalts. Each such invisible particle contains within itself the potential (pause) to embark upon an infinite number of probable variations of consciousness. To that degree such psychological particles are at that stage unspecialized, while they contain within themselves the innate ability to specialize in whatever direction becomes suitable.
DEaVF2 Chapter 8: Session 915, May 12, 1980
All particles will try to combine with each other in as many different probable ways as possible.
The same applies to all “psychological” particles, to units of consciousness, and to their affiliations within personality.
TPS5 Session 898 (Deleted Portion) January 30, 1980
The atoms and molecules are forever moving, and in a way the electrons are the directors of that motion.
WTH Part One: Chapter 1: January 13, 1984
Each unit of consciousness (or CU) intensifies, magnifies its own intent to be—and, you might say, works up from within itself an explosive spark of primal desire that “explodes” into a process that causes physical materialization. It turns into what I have called [an] EE unit,1 in which case it is embarked upon its own kind of physical experience.
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 890, December 19, 1979
These EE units also operate as fields, as waves, or as particles, as the units of consciousness do—but in your terms they are closer to physical orientation. Their die is cast, so to speak: They have already begun the special kind of screening process necessary that will bring about physical form. They begin to deal with the kinds of information that will help form your world. There are literally numberless steps taken before EE units combine in their own fashion to form the most microscopic physical particles, and even here the greatest, gentlest sorting-out process takes place as these units disentangle themselves at certain operational levels (underlined) from their own greater fields of “information,” to specialize in the various elements that will allow for the production of atoms and molecules impeccably suited to your kind of world.
Units of consciousness (CU’s), transforming themselves into EE units, formed the environment and all of its inhabitants in the same process, in what you might call a circular manner rather than a serial one. And in those terms, of course, there are only various physical manifestations of consciousness, not a planet and its inhabitants, but an entire gestalt of awareized consciousness.
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 890, December 19, 1979
CAUTION: The government criminals have likely placed tracking tags on the files and images of this website.
findingseth.com
“Any investigation of the basic inner universe, which is the only real universe, must be done as much as possible from a point outside your own distortions … To get outside your own universe, you must travel inward … Your so-called scientific, so-called objective experiments can continue for an eternity, but they will only probe further and further with camouflage [physical] instruments into a camouflage universe … The subconscious, it is true, has elements of its own distortions, but these are easier to escape than the tons of distortive camouflage atmosphere that weigh your scientific experiments down.”
Session 45. The Early Sessions.
No particular physical particle exists for any amount of time.
No particular physical particle has any kind of durability.
TES2 Session 60 June 8, 1964
The framework is so woven that each particle is dependent upon every other. [...]
[...] It is the developer of all abilities and at the risk of being trite, it is the responsibility of even the most minute particle of consciousness to use its own abilities, and all of its abilities to the utmost.
TES1 Session 29 February 26, 1964
I have said that, first of all, molecules and atoms and even smaller particles, have a condensed consciousness.
[...] The molecules and atoms and even smaller particles, all contain their separate consciousness. [...]
This goes on ad infinitum, and yet even the lowest particle retains its own individuality, and is not stripped of any ability.
TES2 Session 50 May 4, 1964
If we may speak in an analogy, then these particles have two faces. If you consider them as soldiers guarding the barriers or the boundaries, then you would have to imagine a strange creature, our particle, as a soldier on a boundary facing toward and away from the country in question.
[...] The inner alignment and electromagnetic structure of such particles is the main issue that allows them to be, or to operate within, two different units or systems. And while these particles act as resistant boundary forces, they are also uniting forces, forming so to speak the connective tissue that both separates and unites.
These identifying particles, as we will call them, that both close about a system yet still unite it to other systems, these particles are also inherent properties of any unit or system.
TES3 Session 114 December 14, 1964
These coordinate points — absolute, main, or subordinate — represent accumulations or traces of pure energy, minute to an extreme if you are thinking in terms of size — smaller than any particle of which your scientists know for example, but composed of pure energy. [...]
[...] They are, if you prefer, incipient particles that have not yet emerged into matter.
SS Part One: Chapter 5: Session 524, April 20, 1970
There are indeed universes composed of such faster-than-light particles. [...] You simply would not perceive such particles as mass. When these particles are slowed down sufficiently, you do experience them as matter.
SS Part Two: Chapter 20: Session 581, April 14, 1971
While this may sound quite sacrilegious scientifically, it is possible to understand the electron’s nature and greater reality by using certain focuses of consciousness: by probing the electron, for example, with a “laser” [beam] of consciousness finely focused and attuned — and more will be said about this later in the book.
UR1 Section 3: Session 703 June 12, 1974
So can the human self appear in several places at once, each such appearance subtly altering the “human” particle, so that each appearance is a version of an “original” self that as itself never appears in those terms.6 When you look at an electron — figuratively speaking — you are observing a trace or a track of something else entirely, and that appearance is termed an electron. [...] In a way, then, you are as ghostly as an electron.
UR2 Section 5: Session 722 November 27, 1974
“Subatomic particles,” however, appear in your present, rippling into your system’s dimensions, creating their own “tracks,” which scientists then try to observe. In some cases, unknowingly, your scientists are close to observing the birth of time effects within your system."
UR2 Section 5: Session 722 November 27, 1974
This section also includes discussions on the True Dream-Art Scientist, the True Mental Physicist, and the Complete Physician, as well as material on subatomic particles and the spin of electrons in relationship to perceived reality.
UR2 Introductory Notes by Robert F. Butts, 1974
The behavior of electrons, for example, will elude your technological knowledge — for in deepest terms what you will “perceive” will be a facade, an appearance or illusion. So far, within the rules of the game, you have been able to make your “facts” about electrons work. To follow their multidimensional activity however is another matter — (humorously:) a pun — and you need, if you will forgive me, a speedier means.
UR1 Section 3: Session 702 June 10, 1974
Electrons, for example, are slow dullards in comparison with EE units. It goes without saying that the units of consciousness are “mental,” or if you prefer, disembodied, though from their inner organization all physical forms emerge. [...] [...] Now the same applies to these units of consciousness — and to atoms, molecules, electrons, and other such phenomena.
UR1 Section 1: Session 684 February 20, 1974
If physical form is made up of such multitudinous, invisible particles, how much more highly organized must be the inner components of consciousness, without whose perceptions matter itself would be meaningless. The alliances of consciousness, then, are far more vast than those of particles in any form.
TPS4 Deleted Session July 3, 1978
Every visible or invisible particle has consciousness according to its own scale of reality. Each particle, visible or invisible, is awareized energy. This is most difficult to explain, but like, say, the units of some multidimensional computer, each visible or invisible particle carries within it the knowledge of all other particles, including their positions, and their probable positions.
[...] There is then an almost instantaneous flow of information throughout such particles. [...]
That same information is available on a cellular basis (pause), and to the smaller particles that make up the bodies of the experimenters, and the structure of the instruments.
TPS5 Deleted Session April 30, 1979
Each unit of consciousness inherently possesses within itself all of the information available to the whole, and its specific nature when it operates as a particle rests upon that great “body” of inner knowledge. Any one such particle can be where it “is,” be what it is, and be when it is only because the positions, relative positions, and situations of all other such particles are known.
These EE units also operate as fields, as waves, or as particles, as the units of consciousness do—but in your terms they are closer to physical orientation. [...] There are literally numberless steps taken before EE units combine in their own fashion to form the most microscopic physical particles, and even here the greatest, gentlest sorting-out process takes place as these units disentangle themselves at certain operational levels (underlined) from their own greater fields of “information,” to specialize in the various elements that will allow for the production of atoms and molecules impeccably suited to your kind of world.
[...] All of these units of consciousness, again, operate as entities (or particles, or as waves or forces).
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 890, December 19, 1979
It is fashionable to say that some scientific laws can be proven at microscopic levels, where, for example, small particles can be accelerated far beyond [their usual states]. But you quite studiously ignore that feeling exists on microscopic levels, that there can be psychological particles, much less come to the conclusion that all particles are psychological particles, with their own impetuses for development and value fulfillment. [...]
(9:23.) If the simplest particle is so endowed with impetus, with hidden ideals that seek fulfillment, then what about the human being?
NoME Part Three: Chapter 9: Session 866, July 18, 1979
All That Is composes the fabric of the universe—which is everywhere unified, since nothing exists outside of it, and every wave or particle, or field or whatever within it, consists of a divine psychological fabric that is populated by individuation, sensation, meaning, intent, in which the most innocuous shadow of an electron rises up joyfully and shouts “I am I, and not you.”
TPS5 Deleted Session September 20, 1978
Consciousness is within the tiniest particle, whatever its life conditions seem to be, or however it might seem to lack those conditions you call living.
[.I know that each smallest “particle” of consciousness can never be broken down, and that each contains an infinite capacity for creativity and development — and that each is innately blessed.
NotP Chapter 11: Session 796, March 7, 1977
Electrons in your terms are precognitive, and so is your cellular consciousness. Your body’s relative permanence in time is dependent upon the electron’s magnificent behavior as it deals with probabilities.
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 888, December 10, 1979
"...some particles live for far less than a trillionth of a second."
DEaVF1 Chapter 2: Session 884, October 3, 1979
The varieties of consciousness—the inner “psychological particles,” the psychic equivalent, say, of the atom or molecule, or proton, neutron or quark—these nonphysical, charmed, strange forms of consciousness that make experience go up or down (all with amusement), and around and around, are never of course dealt with.
The atom, the molecule, the proton and neutron, the electrons, the quarks and other families of particles represent aspects of consciousness itself, which man then projects into the world of physics.
TPS4 Deleted Session July 3, 1978
Beyond certain levels it is almost meaningless to speak in terms of particles, but I will for now use the term “invisible particles” because you are familiar with it. Invisible particles, then, form the foundation of your world. The invisible particles that I am referring to, however, have the ability to transform themselves into mass,1 or to divest themselves of it. And the invisible particles of which I speak not only possess consciousness—but each one is, if you will, a seed that contains within itself a potential for an infinite number of gestalts. Each such invisible particle contains within itself the potential (pause) to embark upon an infinite number of probable variations of consciousness. To that degree such psychological particles are at that stage unspecialized, while they contain within themselves the innate ability to specialize in whatever direction becomes suitable.
DEaVF2 Chapter 8: Session 915, May 12, 1980
All particles will try to combine with each other in as many different probable ways as possible.
The same applies to all “psychological” particles, to units of consciousness, and to their affiliations within personality.
TPS5 Session 898 (Deleted Portion) January 30, 1980
The atoms and molecules are forever moving, and in a way the electrons are the directors of that motion.
WTH Part One: Chapter 1: January 13, 1984
Each unit of consciousness (or CU) intensifies, magnifies its own intent to be—and, you might say, works up from within itself an explosive spark of primal desire that “explodes” into a process that causes physical materialization. It turns into what I have called [an] EE unit,1 in which case it is embarked upon its own kind of physical experience.
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 890, December 19, 1979
These EE units also operate as fields, as waves, or as particles, as the units of consciousness do—but in your terms they are closer to physical orientation. Their die is cast, so to speak: They have already begun the special kind of screening process necessary that will bring about physical form. They begin to deal with the kinds of information that will help form your world. There are literally numberless steps taken before EE units combine in their own fashion to form the most microscopic physical particles, and even here the greatest, gentlest sorting-out process takes place as these units disentangle themselves at certain operational levels (underlined) from their own greater fields of “information,” to specialize in the various elements that will allow for the production of atoms and molecules impeccably suited to your kind of world.
Units of consciousness (CU’s), transforming themselves into EE units, formed the environment and all of its inhabitants in the same process, in what you might call a circular manner rather than a serial one. And in those terms, of course, there are only various physical manifestations of consciousness, not a planet and its inhabitants, but an entire gestalt of awareized consciousness.
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 890, December 19, 1979
CAUTION: The government criminals have likely placed tracking tags on the files and images of this website.